Posts com a tag "civil rights framework for internet"

A formulação de um marco civil para a Internet brasileira foi um processo colaborativo que ocorreu na rede social culturadigital.br. Hoje, ela agrega cerca de 5 mil usuários e 3 mil blogs cadastrados, com 280 grupos de discussão para os mais diversos temas do universo da cultura digital, segundo dados de maio de 2010.

A partir da experiência pioneira do marco civil, a rede culturadigital.br tornou-se referência para a realização de consultas públicas abertas e participativas. Mais do que uma plataforma de simples interação com usuários na Internet, o conjunto de softwares que possibilitou a consulta pública do marco civil tornou-se um ambiente de construção colaborativa, extrapolando limites da construção legislativa na democracia, através de tecnologia livre.

Na próxima semana começa a consulta para revisão da lei de direito autoral. Este será o segundo processo legislativo colaborativo realizado em parceria com a Coordenação de Cultura Digital do Ministério da Cultura. A coordenação é responsável pela propecção de tecnologias e processos sociais com o objetivo de qualificar a cultura de uso das tecnologias digitais e da rede.

A ideia é que essa tecnologia seja apropriada por diferentes grupos sociais, de órgãos governamentais a pequenos coletivos. A Coordenação de Cultura Digital pretende publicar a documentação desse processo até o Fórum Internacional de Software Livre (Fisl), que acontecerá de 21 a 24 de julho em Porto Alegre (RS).

Nesta sexta-feira(21),  a equipe do Marco Civil da Internet recebeu por e-mail a colaboração da Federação Internacional da Indústria Fonográfica (IFPI), abaixo reproduzida, com a devida autorização:

IFPI submission on the Draft Proposal for a Regulatory Framework for the Internet

May 2010

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IFPI, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Draft Law Setting Forth the Civil Rights Regulatory Framework for the Internet in Brazil (the “Draft Proposal”) presented by the Ministry of Justice’s Legislative Affairs Department (Secretaria de Assuntos Legislativos do Ministério da Justiça) on 8 April 2010 for a 45 day Public Consultation.

(more…)

Clic aquí para ver la versión en español

We present the complete version of the new proposed text for the Draft Bill Proposition on Civil Rights Framework for Internet in Brazil, in four formats (.txt, .rtf, .doc, .pdf).

RTFPDFTXT DOC

clique the icon to download

And, below, the new text, with direct links to the respectives formats,  also,  you can see the modification made on the proposal step-by-step:

Section IV

On the content removal

Article 19. The Internet connection provider will not be liable for damages resulting from content generated by third parties. (preserved)

Article 20. The Internet service provider may only be liable for damages arising out of content generated by third parties if the provider was notified and did not take the steps within its competence in a reasonable term to make unavailable the content signaled as harmful.

§ 1. Internet service providers must maintain at least one clearly visible electronic channel for the receiving notifications and counter-notices.

§ 2. The Internet service provider may create an automated mechanism in order to conform to the procedures described in this Section


Article 20. The Internet service provider may only be liable for damages arising out of content generated by third parties if the provider receives a court order, and fail to comply with its ruling, in order to take the measures within its scope of service and within the defined term to make the content the court signaled as infringing unavailable. (proposal for new text)


Article 21. The notification describe on Article 20 shall contain, under penalty of invalidation:

I – identification of the applicant, including full name, civil registry and fiscal identification numbers and current contact information;

II – date and time of transmission;

III – clear and specific identification of the content signaled as harmful to enable unambiguous locality of the notified material;

IV – description of the relationship between the applicant and the content identified as harmful; and

VI – legal justification for removal.


Article 21. The court order described on Article 20 shall contain, under penalty of invalidation (proposal for new text)

I – identification of the applicant, including full name, civil registry and fiscal identification numbers and current contact information;

II – clear and specific identification of the content signaled as harmful to enable unambiguous locality of the notified material;

III – description of the relationship between the applicant and the content identified as harmful; and

IV – legal justification for removal.


Article 22. After removing the content, Internet service providers will be responsible to report this action to the user who has produced the content, quoting the reasons for removal as raised by the notification, and establishing a reasonable deadline for the permanent removal.

Sole Paragraph. If the user responsible for the harmful content is not identifiable or able to be located, and if the requirements for notification are met, the service provider should keep the content unavailable.

Article 22. After removing the content, Internet service providers will be responsible to report this action to the user who has produced the content, quoting the reasons for the court order, whenever the user responsible for the infringing content is identifiable. (proposal for new text)


Article 23. The user who has produced the content can counter-notice the Internet service provider – properly attending the requirements of Article 21 – in order to require the restoration of the blocked content and, by doing so, assuming sole responsibility for any damage caused to third parties. In response to the counter-notice, the service provider will be obliged to restore access to the blocked content and to inform the party who presented the notification that it has been restored.

Sole Paragraph. Any other interested parties, be it individuals or legal entities, properly attending the requirements of Article 21, may present counter-notice, assuming, by doing so, responsibility for the content’s maintenance.

Article 23. Users who possess administrative powers to manage content will be treated alike Internet service providers for the purposes of the clauses described in this Section. (preserved)

Article 24. Both the party that reports harmful content and the party that contests the removal of the content will be held responsible for any false or erroneous information they provide, as well as for abusive behavior or bad faith, in accordance to the law. (suppressed)

Article 25. Users who possess administrative powers to manage content will be treated alike Internet service providers for the purposes of the clauses described in this Section. (suppressed)

Contribuições Recebidas

Abaixo, segue a lista das contribuições recebidas por e-mail, indicando as que já foram publicadas aqui no blog e as que ainda serão:


atualizada em 01/06/2010 18h20



NÃO PUBLICADAS


PUBLICADAS


NACIONAIS:

ABES
ABPD
Abril Digital
Aiyra
Bandeirantes
BKBG
Claro
CNPG
Embratel
GPOPAI
IASP
IBDE
IDEC
LegalTech
Marcelo Thompson
Ministério da Fazenda
MPA Brasil
Polícia Federal
PPP
PROTESTE
Prof. Demi Getschko
Transparência HackDay
União Brasileira de Vídeo

INTERNACIONAIS:


Arábia Saudita
África do Sul
Argélia
Argentina (CAPIF)
Argentina
Áustria
Bahamas
Burkina Faso
Cingapura
Chile (IFPI)
China
Colômbia
Dinamarca
ESA
Espanha
Espanha (FilAiE)
Estados Unidos (Embaixada do Brasil em Washington)
Estados Unidos (IFPI)
Estônia
Grécia
Guiana
Guiné
Israel
Itália
Japão
Jordânia
México (AMPROFON)
México (SACM)
Namíbia
Omã
Suécia
Suíça
Uruguai
Uruguai (Ministério de Relações Exteriores)


Aproveitando a oportunidade, achamos importante ressaltar que o debate aberto da Minuta está encerrado, mas a questão do diálogo entre o direito e a Internet não se esgota. Por isso, durante a análise detalhada e estruturada das contribuições recebidas desde o dia 8 de abril, nossa equipe manterá olhos e ouvidos abertos.

RSS Últimos comentários